Continually Minimise IR35 Risk

24th January 2010

We can assist in this process, by reviewing your current contractual terms and working practices, to assess “IR35 tax risk” and then suggest improvements.

HMRC provide an online tool to assess your employment status:

The following badges of trade are some of the factors HM Revenue & Customs would use in assessing whether income from a particular contract is subject to the IR35 tax rules:

Badges of Trade

 

 

Indicative of Self-Employment

 (Contract for Service)

(ie: IR35 does not apply)

Indicative of Employment

(Contract of Service)

(ie: IR35 does apply)

 Control
You have the right to decide how, when and where a job is done.

Leading test cases: ECR Consulting Ltd, Castle Construction (Chesterfield) Ltd, Ready Mixed Concrete.

Close directional supervision by your client (master – servant relationship). Staff rules and regulations. Client can dismiss you.

Leading test cases: Autoclenz Ltd, Andrews, Stagecraft Ltd.

Personal Services
You have the substitution or delegation right to decide by whom a job is done (ie it is not a personal service).

Leading test cases: ECR Consulting Ltd, Community Dental Centres Ltd, MBF Design Services Ltd, Express and Echo Publications Ltd.

Single named worker only, or non matching contracts either side of agency, providing a personal service

Leading test case: Dragonfly Consultancy Ltd.

Basis of remuneration
Remunerated on a project basis, or at a fixed price. Remunerated on a time basis.
Provision of equipment
 You supply large or expensive equipment, and may work from a dedicated area of your own premises. Provision of only small or no equipment. Work at client’s premises.

Leading test case: Hall v Lorimer

Trading structure
Trade with more than one client at a time, or work on short successive assignments with different clients.

Leading test case: MBF Design Services Ltd, Market Investigations Ltd.

Long term assignments with the
same client. Working for previous employer, within the public sector or as an officer of the client.
Financial risk
A loss can be suffered. All rejected work to be corrected at your own cost. Penalty clauses. The opportunity exists to make a larger profit from sound management.

Leading test case: J and C Windows.

No financial exposure. All rejected work to be corrected at your client’s cost.
Business organisation
Own premises, letterheads, domain, website, training, other employees, insurance etc. Quoting for jobs in advance. Advertising None.
Terms of engagement
Contracts and actual working practices which are consistent with beneficial badges of trade. If engaged through an agency, then both contracts must match. Contracts which do not record the above beneficial badges of trade, no contracts at all, or actual work practises which differ from those recorded (sham).

Leading test case: Autoclenz Ltd.

Employee rights
 None. Typical employee benefits and statutory protection (eg paid holidays, sick pay, etc).
Part and parcel of the organisation
Appear and behave differently to employees. Re: staff parties, training days, e-mail address, canteen, parking space, etc.

Leading test cases: Novasoft Ltd,.

Appear and behave the same as employees.

Leading test cases: Dragonfly Consultancy Ltd, Future Online Ltd.

Mutuality of obligations and intentions
No obligation to offer and accept work over a period of time.

Leading test cases: ECR Consulting Ltd, Larkstar Data Ltd.

Mutual committment to offer and accept work over a period of time.

Leading test cases: Airfix Footwear Ltd, Synaptek Ltd.

The overall picture of employment status, and hence your IR35 status, would ultimately be determined by a court of law based on the “balance of probabilities” test; and not based on the “beyond reasonable doubt” test which is the yardstick by which most Tax Inspectors wrongly arrive at an opinion. In deciding IR35 status, a tribunal would arrive at a decision after having ‘painted a picture from the accumulation of detail’. If the detail gives a balanced picture, then the mutual intention of both parties will be the deciding factor.  This is why the detail is important and this is an area where we can offer guidance.



 
Other items in Blogs
 
Kim Clayden
13th April 2018 Making Tax Digital Seminar Two – St Ives

       Our second MTD seminar was in St Ives at the Slepe Hall Hotel on Thursday 12th April. Which was a much more convivial venue. A smaller group meant more personal conversations with our clients and we were able to give a number of clients the time they needed to fully understand the next steps for…

Read More »

Daniel Coleman
11th April 2018 Making Tax Digital ‘Roadshow’ – Huntingdon

We have begun the first of eight seminars discussing the preparation needed for making tax digital. Our first seminar kicked off in Huntingdon at the Marriott hotel and was a great success. With around 30 people attending we explained to clients what making tax digital was, how it was going to effect them and more…

Read More »

Paul Jefferson
5th April 2018 Reclaiming VAT: Checking the validity of your supplier invoices.

  VAT registered businesses will be aware that they can only reclaim VAT on business purchases if they have a valid VAT invoice.   For supplies over £250, this invoice should disclose: Supplier: sales invoice unique sequential invoice number, name, address and VAT number. Date and tax point, if different Your name and address Description…

Read More »

Scott Butcher
5th April 2018 Deadline Approaching for ATED forms

  If you have a residential property which is worth more than £500,000 and is held in a company then you will be required to complete an Annual Tax on Residential Dwellings (ATED) form. The deadline is fast approaching with all ATED forms for 2018 to 2019 tax year being due for filing by 30th…

Read More »

Vanessa Pearson
5th April 2018 HMRC loses IR35 case

  A contractor in the construction industry, Mark Daniels, has won his appeal against HMRC. In MDCM Ltd v Revenue & Customs, HMRC were defending their decision that a contract between Mr Daniels’ personal service company MDMC Ltd and recruitment agency Solutions, which provided his services to Structure Tone Ltd,  should have been caught by…

Read More »

Richard Alecock
5th April 2018 Top mistakes tax payers make when completing their tax returns.

  Making mistakes on self assessment tax returns however innocent can lead to enquiries, investigations and additional tax, interest and penalties. Below are some of the top mistakes many people make: Forgetting to include income from a previous employment that ended part way through a tax year. Forgetting to include benefits from a previous employment…

Read More »